that the joints in the sleeving are staggered with the pier pipe couplings. This method is not as economical as an Inertia Sleeve, because the external sleeving must be installed after the pier has been driven and prior to field load testing.
The external sleeving installation requires the use of the hydraulic drive cylinder. The installation time for the external sleeve is generally equivalent to the time required for installing pier pipe, but only to the required depth for the sleeving.
Presented in Figure 8 is a graphic representation of the shaft stiffness related to differing pier pipe configurations. It is interesting to note that the combination of the Model 350 pier pipe plus the inertia sleeve provides 92% of the axial stiffness of the more costly Model 400 system when there is a lack of sufficient lateral support for a distance of 8 feet. If the designer provides 4” diameter exterior sleeving and grouts the Model 350 pier pipe, the allowable load on the system will be 160% that of the grouted Model 400 pier system. One must keep in mind that the pier sleeving is required only in the areas of weak soil or exposed pier pipe. The cost savings should be very evident especially on projects that require extra strength only in the upper several feet of soil.
When specifying sleeving, the designer must extend the sleeving at least three feet into competent material. For example, if a site has 6 feet of peat with blow counts from 0 to 2 blows
per foot followed by sand having suitable density as indicated by an SPT reading of 5 blows per foot or greater; the designer should specify sleeving to a depth of 9 feet in order to provide adequate protection through 6 feet of weak soil.